Digicon Lakes

A process built to remove surprises.

The same five steps whether it is a two-week architecture review or a two-quarter build. Predictable, written down, and visible to you throughout.

1Day 0

Share your requirements

One short form or one call. We want the system, the constraint, the deadline, and who is affected if it slips. No discovery theatre before we understand the problem.

What you get

  • Signed NDA if you need one
  • A named engineer on your brief
2Days 1–5

Discovery & alignment

We read the code, the architecture, and the roadmap, and talk to the people who operate the system. Then we agree — in writing — what success actually means and how it will be measured.

What you get

  • Current-state assessment
  • Agreed success criteria
  • Risk register, opened
3Week 1–2

Technical plan

A scoped brief: what we are building, in what sequence, what it costs, what could go wrong, and the acceptance criteria we expect to be held to. You approve it before any code is written.

What you get

  • Written scope and sequence
  • Effort and cost estimate
  • Acceptance criteria
4Ongoing

Execution & support

Senior engineers ship in short cycles. Every week there is a demo, a written status, and an honest list of open risks — including the ones that make us look slow.

What you get

  • Weekly demo
  • Written status report
  • Open risk list, visible to you
5At close

Handover & partnership

Documentation, runbooks, and a walkthrough with your engineers. The system is yours to operate on day one after we leave — and we stay reachable when something changes.

What you get

  • Handover pack & runbooks
  • Team walkthrough
  • Ongoing advisory line
Working principles

How we behave when it gets difficult.

Process is easy to publish. These are the habits that decide whether it holds under pressure.

Say the uncomfortable thing early

If the deadline is not real or the architecture will not hold, you hear it in week one — not in the retrospective.

Small, reversible steps

We prefer changes that can be shipped behind a flag and rolled back in minutes over big-bang releases.

Write it down

Decisions, trade-offs, and rejected options are recorded. Six months later your team can still see why.

Leave the system better staffed than we found it

Mentoring and code review are part of the engagement, not an upsell.

Practicalities

Running an engagement.

Read access to the relevant repositories and architecture docs, one technical point of contact, and a clear statement of the constraint. That is usually enough to run discovery.

A weekly demo of working software plus a short written status covering what shipped, what is next, and which risks are open. Nothing is reported as done until it is in an environment you can see.

We re-scope in writing and show the trade-off — what moves out if the new work moves in. Scope changes are normal; silent scope changes are not.

Yes. We work inside your accounts, your access controls, and your review process, and we can sign NDAs and DPAs before discovery begins.

Start with step one.

Send us the system, the constraint, and the deadline. You will have a first technical response within 24 hours.

No pitch decks. A working session with the engineers who would do the work.